|
Events: Roundtables
Rebellion, Myth-Making, and Nation Building:
Lebanon
from an Ottoman Mountain Iltizam to a Nation-State
December 3, 2007, 5:00-6:00PM
Fares Center Conference
Room
Cosponsored by The Middle Eastern Studies Program,
Tufts University
Speaker: Abdul-Rahim Abu-Husayn, Professor of History,
American University of Beirut; Visiting Scholar, The
Fares Center for Eastern Mediterranean Studies
Summary
Abdul-Rahim Abu-Husayn, Professor of History at the
American University of Beirut and Fall 2007 Visiting
Scholar at the Fares Center for Eastern Mediterranean
Studies, presented his research at a roundtable
cosponsored by The Middle Eastern Studies Program of
Tufts University.
Based upon his research of Ottoman archival materials
and his criticism of Lebanese canonical historians, Abu-Husayn
portrayed an alternative view of Lebanon's evolution
from an Ottoman outpost to a full-fledged nation-state.
His principal argument was that the Lebanese resistance
of the Ottomans in the form of a “long rebellion” was
instrumental in creating a Lebanese entity in 1861 and
in giving the country its national hero: Fakhreddine II
of the Maanid dynasty.
Fakhreddine's role in resisting the Turks is one of the
few points that historians, be they pan-Arabists or
Lebanese particularists, agree upon. As a result,
Fakhreddine's position as the “father of Lebanon” has
become quasi-official. However, Abu-Husayn considers
Fakhreddine's legacy as the historical explanation for
the emergence of the Lebanese state in the late
nineteenth century to be greatly exaggerated. His
research concurs with the findings of Lebanese historian
Kamal Salibi, who contends that Fakhreddine's control
over a number of areas that comprised Lebanon was not
necessarily part of a grand design to unite those areas
into a single Lebanese state.
Abu-Husayn also found that like all other emirs of his
time, Fakhreddine had an oscillating relationship with
the Ottomans. His only distinction is that he enjoyed
outside support from European powers such as Tuscany and
the Catholic Papacy. Indeed, since Fakhreddine was
Druze, this external support is what made him popular in
Maronite Christian circles. Maronite Patriarch historian
Estfan Houeiek has maintained that Fakhreddine's clout
in Maronite Christian circles is due to his being raised
in a Maronite household, but Abu-Husayn emphasized that
strong instructions from the papacy to assist
Fakhreddine and the Maanid dynasty were more
influential.
Abu-Husayn also challenged the traditional version of
Lebanese historiography regarding the formation of
Lebanon. After the bitter civil war fought between the
Maronites and Druze in the nineteenth century, the
Maronites emerged as the leading community in many
respects. As the most organized institution, the
Maronite church under Patriarch Houeiek demanded the
formation of a greater Lebanon with special connections
to France.
Abu-Husayn refined this account by adding that the idea
of a greater Lebanon had been previously advanced by
Paul Njeim, a Maronite intellectual who argued that the
notion of a greater Lebanon simply constituted a return
to the Lebanon of Fakhreddine, whom he credited for
forming a “civilized state resembling those of Europe.”
Abu-Husayn characterized Njeim's hypothesis as a typical
nationalist attempt to seek a historical antecedent for
his projected Lebanon, but he also highlighted the
unusual fact that the hero of this Maronite-imagined
golden age was Druze.
Abu-Husayn attributed this anomaly to the desire of
Lebanese Maronites to legitimize the rule of the Shehabi
dynasty, which followed the Maans. The Maronites had
come to be the masters of the region—in both economic
matters and administration of the emirates—after the
death of the last Maanid emir and the ascension of the
Christian house of Shehab. By praising Fakhreddine, the
Patriarch historian Doueihi was attempting to impart a
sense of Ottoman legitimacy upon the Maans and the
Shehabs. As Doueihi was concerned about the survival of
his religious community, he believed that this
legitimacy was critical to appease non-Christians in the
area. Based on the contemporary Lebanese nationalist
narrative and the unrivaled position of Fakhreddine in
Lebanese historical textbooks, not withstanding Abu-Husayn's
findings, Douiehi's success was great indeed.
~ By Tarek Zeidan (MALD '09)
More Roundtable Events > |